Apple has reportedly ammended their ToS today (including 3.3.1)
September 9th, 2010 by scottjanousekSo it appears today, Apple posted a statement about further amending their terms of service for iOS to allow for developers to choice what tools they want to use to create content for their ecosystem.
“The App Store has revolutionized the way mobile applications are developed and distributed. With over 250,000 apps and 6.5 billion downloads, the App Store has become the world’s largest mobile application platform and App Store developers have earned over one billion dollars from the sales of their apps.
We are continually trying to make the App Store even better. We have listened to our developers and taken much of their feedback to heart. Based on their input, today we are making some important changes to our iOS Developer Program license in sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2 and 3.3.9 to relax some restrictions we put in place earlier this year.
In particular, we are relaxing all restrictions on the development tools used to create iOS apps, as long as the resulting apps do not download any code. This should give developers the flexibility they want, while preserving the security we need.
In addition, for the first time we are publishing the App Store Review Guidelines to help developers understand how we review submitted apps. We hope it will make us more transparent and help our developers create even more successful apps for the App Store.
The App Store is perhaps the most important milestone in the history of mobile software. Working together with our developers, we will continue to surprise and delight our users with innovative mobile apps.”
Read the statement here.
I’m not going to comment until I’ve digested all the legal and figure out what Apple’s (real) intent is, and how this impacts the Adobe iPhone Packager, which it first look it seems it does.
There’s a post comparing old and new terms.


September 9th, 2010 at 5:14 pm
After a bit of scrutiny of the iOS terms it seems that even a swf+player packaged together would be viable. No need for cross compiling even.