<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20 Million Windows Mobile Devices Shipped in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2009/05/24/20-million-windows-mobile-devices-shipped-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2009/05/24/20-million-windows-mobile-devices-shipped-in-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:56:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Downes</title>
		<link>http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2009/05/24/20-million-windows-mobile-devices-shipped-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-132557</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 07:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/?p=5999#comment-132557</guid>
		<description>Having been a fan of WM devices in the past, and an owner of a Motorola Q, I can say that I am not impressed by what I have seen of the next gen MS phones. I won&#039;t be buying one.

I think the reason many of us don&#039;t own touch screens is the cost. To me, spending $200-600 every year or two is just ridiculous. I don&#039;t upgrade my PC that often and it makes me money. So I&#039;ll likely have my Q for a while, at least until the Palm Pre is available on other providers and the cost comes down.

That being said, overall the Q hasn&#039;t been a bad phone, and will likely continue to be useful for at least a couple more years. The web browsing experience leaves a lot to be desired, but it&#039;s served me well for the things I need it for most: real time email, contacts and tasks via Exchange push mail and tethering it to my laptop via Bluetooth for 3G on the road.

I do know that recent Apple and MS devices are a huge turnoff for me, for various reasons. I&#039;d love to see some new Android devices, but Android doesn&#039;t really seem to be picking up steam in the phone markets. So far, the Pre is the only thing that&#039;s gotten me excited and primarily this is because of the opportunity to build apps for it that don&#039;t require me to learn .NET or Objective C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been a fan of WM devices in the past, and an owner of a Motorola Q, I can say that I am not impressed by what I have seen of the next gen MS phones. I won&#8217;t be buying one.</p>
<p>I think the reason many of us don&#8217;t own touch screens is the cost. To me, spending $200-600 every year or two is just ridiculous. I don&#8217;t upgrade my PC that often and it makes me money. So I&#8217;ll likely have my Q for a while, at least until the Palm Pre is available on other providers and the cost comes down.</p>
<p>That being said, overall the Q hasn&#8217;t been a bad phone, and will likely continue to be useful for at least a couple more years. The web browsing experience leaves a lot to be desired, but it&#8217;s served me well for the things I need it for most: real time email, contacts and tasks via Exchange push mail and tethering it to my laptop via Bluetooth for 3G on the road.</p>
<p>I do know that recent Apple and MS devices are a huge turnoff for me, for various reasons. I&#8217;d love to see some new Android devices, but Android doesn&#8217;t really seem to be picking up steam in the phone markets. So far, the Pre is the only thing that&#8217;s gotten me excited and primarily this is because of the opportunity to build apps for it that don&#8217;t require me to learn .NET or Objective C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
