Comments on: Harvard Flash Lite Intro Preso files http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2007/05/11/harvard-flash-lite-intro-preso-files/ Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:32:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Scott Janousek http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2007/05/11/harvard-flash-lite-intro-preso-files/comment-page-1/#comment-61352 Scott Janousek Mon, 14 May 2007 14:12:40 +0000 http://www.scottjanousek.com/blog/2007/05/11/harvard-flash-lite-intro-preso-files/#comment-61352 Some of my more recent slide decks try to address this question (1.1 or 2.x). Really it is a business question more than anything else. Do you want the penetration rate that 1.1 offers, or do you want to skip 1.1 and concentrate on 2.x? ... this will depend on numerous deployment factors: region, operator(s), target devices, and other criteria. Some of my more recent slide decks try to address this question (1.1 or 2.x). Really it is a business question more than anything else.

Do you want the penetration rate that 1.1 offers, or do you want to skip 1.1 and concentrate on 2.x? … this will depend on numerous deployment factors: region, operator(s), target devices, and other criteria.

]]> By: William G http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2007/05/11/harvard-flash-lite-intro-preso-files/comment-page-1/#comment-61344 William G Mon, 14 May 2007 12:22:27 +0000 http://www.scottjanousek.com/blog/2007/05/11/harvard-flash-lite-intro-preso-files/#comment-61344 So you're not for a FL1.1 death ? I was about to focus only on FL2.x but you seems to say it's a bad idea... So you’re not for a FL1.1 death ?
I was about to focus only on FL2.x but you seems to say it’s a bad idea…

]]>