<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 800&#215;480 on a 2.9&#8243; display for mobile devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2006/12/29/800x480-on-a-29-display-for-mobile-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2006/12/29/800x480-on-a-29-display-for-mobile-devices/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Eberhardt</title>
		<link>http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2006/12/29/800x480-on-a-29-display-for-mobile-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-41195</link>
		<dc:creator>James Eberhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottjanousek.com/blog/2006/12/29/800x480-on-a-29-display-for-mobile-devices/#comment-41195</guid>
		<description>I think this is the display that the rumoured iRiver G10 would have used.  A google search will show that it should have been 800x480.  Of course, since it's announcement last year, I haven't actually seen any news of it actually being released.  It's a shame, because since it was rumoured to be running Windows Mobile 5, it would have been able to use FL 2.1.  Oh well, maybe the next batch of releases from iRiver will have a new FLED.

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the display that the rumoured iRiver G10 would have used.  A google search will show that it should have been 800&#215;480.  Of course, since it&#8217;s announcement last year, I haven&#8217;t actually seen any news of it actually being released.  It&#8217;s a shame, because since it was rumoured to be running Windows Mobile 5, it would have been able to use FL 2.1.  Oh well, maybe the next batch of releases from iRiver will have a new FLED.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Janousek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple unveils the iPhone</title>
		<link>http://flashmobile.scottjanousek.com/2006/12/29/800x480-on-a-29-display-for-mobile-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-41184</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Janousek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple unveils the iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottjanousek.com/blog/2006/12/29/800x480-on-a-29-display-for-mobile-devices/#comment-41184</guid>
		<description>[...] The display on the device looks beautiful (but not as spectacular as this) &#8230; this is definately going to be one of those mobile devices you don&#8217;t want to sling around (I smell an AppleCare &#8220;plot&#8221; for sure) &#8230; especially given the inital price tag (competive to a highend smartphone). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The display on the device looks beautiful (but not as spectacular as this) &#8230; this is definately going to be one of those mobile devices you don&#8217;t want to sling around (I smell an AppleCare &#8220;plot&#8221; for sure) &#8230; especially given the inital price tag (competive to a highend smartphone). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
